sciencebriefs
13:00in productionCh. 1 · Looking for carbon chains from the stars/ 13:00 · ceiling 15 min
Chemistry · Materials

Fullerene

Kroto was chasing carbon chains from outer space, not a new form of carbon on Earth. Vaporising graphite with a laser to mimic a dying star's atmosphere produced a molecule shaped like a football instead — sixty carbon atoms folded into a closed cage.

In 1985 Harold Kroto, Robert Curl and Richard Smalley, working with colleagues at Rice University, vaporised graphite with a laser to recreate conditions found in the outer atmospheres of carbon-rich stars, and found their mass spectrometer registering a molecule of exactly sixty carbon atoms in unusually large abundance. That molecule, later named buckminsterfullerene for its resemblance to a geodesic dome, turned out to be a stable, closed cage of twelve pentagons and twenty hexagons, opening up an entire family of carbon structures the three shared a Nobel Prize for identifying in 1996.

Chapters & takeaways6
  1. 0:08
    Looking for carbon chains from the stars

    Kroto's motivation was earlier spectroscopic evidence that long carbon-chain molecules exist in interstellar space and in stellar outer atmospheres.

  2. 2:10
    A laser, some graphite, and an unexpected peak

    Vaporising graphite in a helium atmosphere produced a mass spectrum dominated by a molecule of exactly sixty carbon atoms.

  3. 4:20
    A cage shaped like a football

    C60 turned out to be a closed, hollow structure of twelve pentagons and twenty hexagons, the same pattern found on a football.

  4. 6:30
    A third form of carbon nobody had confirmed before

    Fullerenes joined diamond and graphite as a distinct, previously unrecognised way carbon atoms can arrange themselves.

  5. 8:40
    From a lab curiosity to nanotubes and natural deposits

    The same family of structures was later extended to carbon nanotubes and found occurring naturally, and even in cosmic dust.

  6. 10:50
    A discovery worth its origin story

    The astrophysical motivation behind the experiment is as much a part of the story as the molecule it eventually turned up.

Worth your time?

Yes. Study the whole thing.

4.5/ 5
What works
  • explains exactly what experiment produced the discrete mass-spectrometry peak that gave the molecule away
  • keeps the astronomical motivation for the experiment as central rather than treating it as a footnote
  • is specific about the structure, twelve pentagons and twenty hexagons, rather than describing it only as 'cage-like'
What does not
  • does not cover the later commercial and medical applications in technical depth
  • gives limited detail on how carbon nanotubes were subsequently discovered and characterised
Study it if
  • readers who enjoy discoveries that arrive while looking for something else entirely
  • anyone curious how carbon, one of the simplest elements, kept a whole structural form hidden until 1985
  • people interested in the link between astrophysics and laboratory chemistry
Skip it if
  • readers wanting the detailed chemistry of fullerene-based drug delivery or solar cells
  • anyone mainly interested in carbon nanotubes rather than the original C60 discovery
The written brief3 min read

Looking for carbon chains from the stars

The discovery did not begin as a search for a new form of carbon. Harold Kroto had spent the years from 1967 through the mid-1980s at the University of Sussex studying unstable molecular species by spectroscopy, and laboratory measurements combined with radio astronomy observations had shown that long, linear carbon-chain molecules exist in significant abundance both in interstellar space and in the outer atmospheres of certain carbon-rich stars. The 1985 experiment with Robert Curl and Richard Smalley at Rice University was designed to recreate something like those stellar conditions in the laboratory, not to find a new structural form of an already familiar element.

A laser, some graphite, and an unexpected peak

The method was to vaporise graphite with a laser inside a helium atmosphere, producing a sooty residue meant to mimic carbon condensing in a stellar outflow, working with colleagues James Heath, Sean O’Brien and Yuan Liu at Rice University’s laboratory facilities. When the resulting vapour was analysed by mass spectrometry, discrete peaks appeared corresponding to molecules containing exactly sixty or seventy carbon atoms, with the sixty-atom species standing out as unusually abundant and unusually stable compared with the general soot of scattered carbon fragments the vaporisation otherwise produced across the collection surface.

A cage shaped like a football

Working out why sixty carbon atoms should form such a stable cluster led to the molecule’s actual structure: a closed, hollow cage built from twelve five-membered rings and twenty six-membered rings of carbon, arranged in the same overall pattern as the stitched panels on a football. The team named it buckminsterfullerene, after the architect Buckminster Fuller, in recognition of the structure’s resemblance to the geodesic domes he had popularised decades earlier, and the name gave rise to fullerene as the general term for this entire family of closed carbon cages.

A third form of carbon nobody had confirmed before

What this established was that carbon had a confirmed third distinct structural arrangement beyond diamond and graphite, the two forms chemistry had long recognised as carbon’s only known solid arrangements. Where graphite’s carbon atoms sit in flat, stacked sheets and diamond’s carbon atoms form a rigid three-dimensional lattice extending outward in every direction, fullerene carbon atoms instead close entirely into a self-contained, cage-like molecule with no loose or dangling bonds left at its edges, a genuinely new structural category rather than a minor variation on either of the two previously known forms.

From a lab curiosity to nanotubes and natural deposits

The discovery opened onto further structures rather than standing alone as a single curious molecule. Carbon nanotubes, cylindrical relatives of the same closed-cage family, were identified in 1991, and fullerenes were subsequently found occurring naturally, including in a carbon-rich mineral called shungite in 1992 and, later, in cosmic dust observed by NASA’s Spitzer Space Telescope in 2010 — a fitting extension for a molecule whose original motivation had been astrophysical in the first place. Robert Curl, Harold Kroto and Richard Smalley shared the 1996 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for identifying this entire class of molecules.

A discovery worth its origin story

This is worth the time specifically because the discovery’s origin gives it a shape most chemistry stories lack: an experiment built to test an idea about carbon in dying stars turned up an entirely new terrestrial structure instead, and the connection between the two was neither forced nor incidental to the outcome. Readers interested only in fullerenes’ later applications in medicine or electronics can find that material readily elsewhere, but the 1985 discovery itself rewards attention as a case where careful spectroscopy aimed at one question produced an answer to a completely different one.

Same field · Chemistry4 of 58
Up next in Science

Hydrogen

1766 · 13:00

Henry Cavendish isolated the gas in 1766 and showed in 1781 that burning it makes water. He explained both facts through phlogiston theory, a framework chemistry would later discard entirely — the credit for what hydrogen actually is went to Lavoisier, who named it.

13:00