sciencebriefs
9:01in productionCh. 1 · A Rhythm in Ruin/ 9:01 · ceiling 15 min
Evolution · Earth & climate

David M. Raup

1933–2015

Extinction isn’t random — but the 26-million-year pulse Raup found is not a law of nature.

Raup and Sepkoski’s 1984 analysis proposed a 26-million-year periodicity in mass extinctions, using statistical methods on fossil data. It reshaped extinction theory but remains unconfirmed as physical reality.

EvolutionEarth & climateExtinctionPalaeontologyStatisticsExtinction across the network →
Chapters & takeaways4
  1. 0:52
    A Rhythm in Ruin

    The dinosaur extinction 66 mya was framed not as an anomaly but as one pulse in a possible 26-million-year rhythm.

  2. 2:15
    Counting Bones, Not Causes

    They did not dig up fossils — they counted them, statistically, across geological time.

  3. 3:50
    A Partnership in Patterns

    Raup and Sepkoski worked as a pair — their claim rests on joint analysis, not solo insight.

  4. 5:19
    Numbers Over Narratives

    Their method was computational statistics applied to the fossil record — not modelling, not observation, but pattern detection.

Worth your time?

Yes. Study the whole thing.

3.5/ 5
What works
  • introduces testable periodicity hypothesis
  • demonstrates power of quantitative palaeobiology
  • forces confrontation between stochastic and deterministic models of extinction
What does not
  • proves a cause
  • identifies a mechanism
  • confirms cosmic trigger
  • replicates across independent datasets
Study it if
  • evolutionary biologists
  • geochronologists
  • statisticians working with sparse time-series data
Skip it if
  • astronomers seeking orbital evidence
  • policy makers needing actionable risk models
The written brief2 min read

What the work claims

Raup and Sepkoski claimed that the dinosaur extinction 66 mya was part of a recurring cycle of mass extinctions occurring every 26 million years.

How it was done

Raup and Sepkoski used statistical analysis of the fossil record to detect periodicity in extinction events.

Raup was born on 24 April 1933 and raised in Boston, and he came late to the fossil record, having had very little contact with it as a child; he preferred skiing and camping. His first mentor was John Clark, a vertebrate paleontologist and sedimentologist at the University of Chicago. He began at Colby College in Maine, transferred to Chicago for his Bachelor of Science, and took his MA and PhD at Harvard, majoring in geology with a focus on paleontology and biology. He taught at Caltech, Johns Hopkins and the University of Rochester, and was a curator and Dean of Science at the Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago. He retired in 1994 to Washington Island in northern Lake Michigan and died on 9 July 2015. The asteroid 9165 Raup is named for him, and he was elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1996 and the American Philosophical Society in 2002.

What holds up

The statistical detection of periodicity in extinction intensity across the Phanerozoic fossil record remains a documented analytical result from their 1984 PNAS paper.

The 1984 paper is titled “Periodicity of extinctions in the geologic past” and appeared in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. It followed their 1982 paper in Science, “Mass extinctions in the marine fossil record”. Raup had also published “Size of the Permo-Triassic Bottleneck and Its Evolutionary Implications” in Science in 1979.

What does not

The 26-million-year cycle has not been confirmed as causal or physical. The work does not identify a mechanism, nor does it rule out statistical artefact or sampling bias.

Why it matters beyond the lab

It forced geology and evolutionary biology to confront whether extinction is driven by internal biosphere dynamics or external astrophysical triggers — a question still unresolved.

Raup returned to the subject in book form. The Nemesis Affair: A Story of the Death of Dinosaurs and the Ways of Science appeared in 1986 and was revised and expanded in 1999. Extinction: Bad Genes or Bad Luck? followed in 1992, and in 1994 he published “The Role of Extinction in Evolution” in PNAS.

Raup was not only an extinction specialist. He studied the fossil record and the diversity of life on Earth, and his earliest listed papers are on the form of shells: “Computer as aid in describing form in gastropod shells” in Science in 1962 and “Geometric analysis of shell coiling: general problems” in the Journal of Paleontology in 1966. Late in life he helped the Santa Fe Institute develop methods for the evolutionary exploration of morphospace.

Is it worth your time

Yes — it redefined how palaeontologists interpret deep-time patterns, but only as a hypothesis grounded in one dataset and method.

Same field · Evolution4 of 69
9:58
Georges Cuvier1769–1832Cuvier established extinction as fact, founded vertebrate paleontology and comparative anatomy, co-established biostratigraphy via the Paris Basin, and named Pterodactylus — all by comparing fossils to living animals. He attributed extinction to catastrophic floods. His taxonomy included fossils. His flood hypothesis does not hold. His methods and core conclusions do.
13:00
Homo floresiensisIn September 2003, an Australian-Indonesian team excavating Liang Bua cave on the Indonesian island of Flores uncovered a near-complete skeleton, catalogued as LB1, of an adult standing only about a metre tall with a brain volume of roughly 380 to 420 cubic centimetres, comparable to a chimpanzee's. Researchers proposed it represented a new species, Homo floresiensis, nicknamed the hobbit, that had evolved extreme small body and brain size after an ancestral population, likely Homo erectus, became isolated on the island, a pattern called insular dwarfism seen in other island animals. This was disputed for years by researchers including Teuku Jacob, who argued LB1 was simply a modern human with a pathological condition such as microcephaly, but CT scans of the brain case by Dean Falk and colleagues found its structure did not match known microcephaly or other proposed disorders, and other candidate conditions were similarly ruled out on close comparison. Dating has also shifted substantially: an initial estimate placing the remains as young as 12,000 years old was revised in 2016 to a range of roughly 60,000 to 100,000 years for the skeletal material, following recognition of a previously undetected break in the cave's sediment layers.
13:00
Alvarez hypothesisIn 1980 Luis and Walter Alvarez, with chemists Frank Asaro and Helen Michel, proposed that a large asteroid impact, not gradual change, ended the age of non-avian dinosaurs around 66 million years ago, based on unusually high iridium levels in the clay layer marking that boundary worldwide. The prediction was confirmed by the later identification of the 180-kilometre Chicxulub crater in Mexico, matched by shocked quartz, tsunami deposits and, in 2016, drilling evidence from the crater itself. An international panel formally endorsed the impact explanation in 2010, though debate continues over how much a separate episode of Deccan Traps volcanism in India contributed alongside it.
13:00
Kin selectionW.D. Hamilton set out in two 1964 papers a mathematical condition, since called Hamilton's rule, for when a gene favouring altruistic behaviour can spread: it needs the benefit to the recipient, discounted by how closely related the two individuals are, to exceed the cost to the individual behaving altruistically. This gave a genetic explanation for puzzles such as sterile worker ants and bees helping to raise their sisters rather than reproducing themselves, and later studies, including work on red squirrels adopting orphaned pups, found behaviour lining up with the rule's prediction fairly closely. The theory, popularised for a wide audience by Richard Dawkins, became a central plank of how evolutionary biologists explain cooperation, though it has not gone unchallenged: a prominent 2010 paper by E.O. Wilson and colleagues argued the mathematics is unnecessarily complicated and proposed alternatives, prompting a rebuttal signed by well over a hundred researchers defending the original framework.
Up next in Science

Matter wave

· 13:00

Louis de Broglie's 1924 claim that matter behaves like a wave, tested first on electrons and later on molecules weighing tens of thousands of daltons, has held at every scale physicists have managed to test it.

Play nextBack to Evolution
13:00