An idea born from a lecture
In November 1920, Frederick Banting, then a young surgeon, was preparing a lecture on the pancreas at the University of Western Ontario when he read that diabetes was thought to result from a missing hormone normally secreted by clusters of cells in the pancreas called the islets of Langerhans. The obstacle to isolating that hormone was that the pancreas also produces digestive enzymes, including trypsin, that break down proteins, destroying any hormone extracted alongside them before it could be used. Banting’s idea, drawn from a 1920 paper by Moses Barron describing what happens when a pancreatic duct is blocked, was that tying off the duct would destroy the enzyme-producing tissue while leaving the hormone-producing islets intact, making a usable extract possible.
From dog pancreases to calf fetuses
Banting brought the idea to John Macleod, a physiology professor at the University of Toronto, who provided laboratory space and assigned a student, Charles Best, to assist him. Through 1921 the two men worked with dog pancreases, tying off the ducts, waiting for the digestive tissue to degenerate, and then extracting the remaining material to test on diabetic dogs. In November 1921, needing a more practical source of tissue, Banting obtained pancreases from fetal calves at a slaughterhouse and found the extracts worked just as well as those from dogs; by December he had also succeeded in extracting the hormone from adult pancreases, expanding the available supply.
Purifying the extract for people
The extract that worked in dogs was still too impure and inconsistent for safe use in a person, and biochemist James Collip joined the team specifically to solve that problem, developing purification methods that removed enough of the contaminating material to make the hormone, by then called insulin, suitable for human injection. That purification step was not incidental; without it, the raw pancreatic extracts that had treated diabetic dogs were not reliable enough to give to a patient, and Collip’s contribution sat between the initial biological finding and its first clinical use.
The first injection, January 1922
On 11 January 1922, fourteen-year-old Leonard Thompson, a patient at Toronto General Hospital, became the first person treated with insulin, a moment that turned a laboratory finding into a medical treatment within roughly a year of Banting’s original idea. Diabetes at the time, particularly the form now known as type 1, was a condition that reliably killed patients, often within months of diagnosis, through starvation-based management that could delay but not prevent death. By the spring of 1922, Banting had opened a private practice specifically to treat diabetic patients with the new extract, and industrial-scale production followed soon after, extending the treatment well beyond the original Toronto laboratory.
A Nobel Prize that left names out
Recognition for the discovery proved contentious. The 1923 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine went to Banting and Macleod alone, a decision that excluded Best, who had done much of the hands-on laboratory work alongside Banting, and Collip, whose purification method had made human treatment possible in the first place. Both prize recipients responded by splitting their winnings, Banting sharing his half with Best and Macleod sharing his with Collip, an informal correction to a formal recognition that many at the time and since have regarded as too narrow given how collaborative the underlying work had been.
From a death sentence to a managed condition
This is worth understanding because it compresses an entire arc, a specific biochemical problem, a plausible solution, animal testing, purification, and a first human patient, into about fourteen months, a pace that is unusual even by the standards of medical discovery. It is also a clear-eyed case study in how scientific credit does not always track scientific contribution, since the two collaborators without a Nobel medal, Best and Collip, did work that later biographers and historians generally regard as indispensable. An hour spent on the full sequence gives a fuller picture than the shorthand version, in which insulin’s discovery is often reduced to Banting’s name alone.